Estudo de coorte prospectiva de pacientes com câncer de colo de útero: a idade é um fator determinante? / Prospective cohort study of cervical cancer patients: is age a determining factor?

Authors

  • Ana Carolina Vieira Selva
  • Carlos Vinícius Pacheco dos Santos Guarana
  • Victor de Souza Dias
  • Jurema Telles Sales
  • Carla Rameri Alexandre Silva de Azevedo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34119/bjhrv3n4-115

Keywords:

Neoplasias do colo do útero, Epidemiologia, Diagnóstico, Resultado do tratamento, Idoso.

Abstract

Introdução: O câncer de colo de útero (CCU) apresenta alta prevalência e mortalidade. No Brasil, é a terceira causa mais comum de câncer no grupo feminino, acometendo também a população idosa. Objetivo: Delinear a epidemiologia de pacientes jovens e idosas com câncer de colo de útero e avaliar a eficácia do tratamento desse câncer no Instituto de Medicina Integral Prof. Fernando Figueira. Método: A partir de 2015, iniciou-se uma coorte de pacientes geriátricos em paralelo a outra coorte de pacientes com câncer de colo de útero. Este trabalho é o resultado da análise retrospectiva, específica de pacientes com câncer de colo de útero extraídas de ambas as coortes citadas. Foram coletados os dados demográficos, sobre os sintomas iniciais, estadiamento na ocasião do diagnóstico, tempo de início dos sintomas até o estabelecimento do diagnóstico, tempo do diagnóstico até o início do tratamento, sobrevida livre de doença e sobrevida global. Resultados: Foram incluídas 120 pacientes em ambas as coortes. Dentre estas, 73 tinham o diagnóstico de CCU e dados suficientes. Escolaridade e multiparidade mostraram efeitos significativos, sendo o analfabetismo e paridade de quatro a seis fatores de risco para o câncer de colo, especialmente entre o grupo de idosas. Ambos os grupos realizaram quimioterapia concomitante à radioterapia, tendo as adultas maior percentual de óbito em relação às idosas, ainda que esta diferença não tenha sido significativa. Conclusão: Este estudo observou que o principal resultado histopatológico foi de carcinoma escamoso e o estadiamento mais comum foi o III, refletindo um tratamento principalmente quimioterápico, com uma sobrevida estatisticamente semelhante entre os dois grupos.

 

References

Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 Mar;65(2):87-108.

Toye MA, Okunade KS, Roberts AA, Salako O, Oridota ES, Onajole AT. Knowledge, perceptions and practice of cervical cancer prevention among female public secondary school teachers in Mushin local government area of Lagos State, Nigeria. Pan Afr Med J. 2017 Nov 10;28:221.

World Health Organization. (2015). World report on ageing and health: Summary. Geneva: Author.

Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva. Coordenação de prevenção e vigilância estimativa. Estimativa 2016: Incidência de Câncer no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: INCA, 2015.

Fonseca Allex Jardim da, Ferreira Leonardo Pires, Dalla-Benetta Anderson César, Roldan Cibelli Navarro, Ferreira Mauro Luiz Schmitz. Epidemiology and economic impact of cervical cancer in Roraima, a Northern state of Brazil: the public health system perspective. Rev. Bras. Ginecol. Obstet. [Internet]. 2010 Aug [cited 2018 May 12] ; 32( 8 ): 386-392.

Walboomers JM, Jacobs MV, Manos MM, Bosch FX, Kummer JA, Shah KV, Snijders PJ, Peto J, Meijer CJ, Muñoz N. Human papillomavirus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer worldwide. J Pathol. 1999 Sep;189(1):12-9.

Thuler, L.C.S.; Bergman, A.; Casado, L. Perfil das Pacientes com Câncer do Colo do Útero no Brasil, 2000-2009: Estudo de Base Secundária. Rev Bras Cancerol, v. 58, n. 3, p. 351-7, 2012.

Diver EJ, Hinchcliff EM, Gockley AA, Melamed A, Contrino L, Feldman S, Growdon WB. Assessment of treatment factors and clinical outcomes in cervical cancer in older women compared to women under 65 years old. J Geriatr Oncol. 2018 Mar 1.

Yoo W, Kim S, Huh WK, Dilley S, Coughlin SS, Partridge EE, Chung Y, Dicks V, Lee JK, Bae S. Recent trends in racial and regional disparities in cervical cancer incidence and mortality in United States. PLoS One. 2017 Feb 24;12(2):e0172548.

Hurria A, Togawa K, Mohile SG, Owusu C, Klepin HD, Gross CP, Lichtman SM, Gajra A, Bhatia S, Katheria V, Klapper S, Hansen K, Ramani R, Lachs M, Wong FL, Tew WP. Predicting chemotherapy toxicity in older adults with cancer: a prospective multicenter study. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Sep 1;29(25):3457-65.

Hurria A, Dale W, Mooney M, Rowland JH, Ballman KV, Cohen HJ, Muss HB, Schilsky RL, Ferrell B, Extermann M, Schmader KE, Mohile SG; Cancer and Aging Research Group. Designing therapeutic clinical trials for older and frail adults with cancer: U13 conference recommendations. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Aug 20;32(24):2587-94.

Sharma A, Kulkarni V, Bhaskaran U, Singha M, Mujtahedi S, Chatrath A, Sridhar M, Thapar R, Mithra PP, Kumar N, Holla R, Darshan BB, Kumar A. Profile of cervical cancer patients attending Tertiary Care Hospitals of Mangalore, Karnataka: A 4 year retrospective study. J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2017 Jan-Jun;8(1):125-129.

Ali R, Barnes I, Kan SW, Beral V. Cancer incidence in British Indians and British whites in Leicester, 2001-2006. Br J Cancer. 2010 Jun 29;103(1):143-8.

Shi D, Liang Z, Zhang C, Zhang H, Liu X. The effect of surgery on the survival status of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer after radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy: a meta-analysis. BMC Cancer. 2018 Mar 20;18(1):308.

Sharma C, Deutsch I, Horowitz DP, Hershman DL, Lewin SN, Lu YS, Neugut AI, Herzog TJ, Chao CK, Wright JD. Patterns of care and treatment outcomes for elderly women with cervical cancer. Cancer. 2012 Jul 15;118(14):3618-26.

Wang W, Hou X, Yan J, Shen J, Lian X, Sun S, Liu Z, Meng Q, Wang D, Zhao M, Qiu J, Hu K, Zhang F. Outcome and toxicity of radical radiotherapy or concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for elderly cervical cancer women. BMC Cancer. 2017 Aug 1;17(1):510.

Denny L, Herrero R, Levin C, et al. Cervical Cancer. In: Gelband H, Jha P, Sankaranarayanan R, et al., editors. Cancer: Disease Control Priorities, Third Edition (Volume 3). Washington (DC): The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank; 2015 Nov 1.Chapter 4. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK343648/.

Li, X., Hu, S. Y., He, Y., Hernandez Donoso, L., Qu, K. Q., Van Kriekinge, G., & Zhao, F. H. (2018). Systematic literature review of risk factors for cervical cancer in the Chinese population. Women's Health, 14, 1745506518816599.

Mascarello KC, Silva NF, Piske MT, Viana KCG, Zandonade E, Amorim MHC. Perfil de Mulheres com Câncer do Colo do Útero. Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia 2012; 58(3): 417-426.

Shrestha, A. D., Neupane, D., Vedsted, P., & Kallestrup, P. (2018). Cervical Cancer Prevalence, Incidence and Mortality in Low and Middle Income Countries: A Systematic Review. Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 19(2), 319–324.

Lim, A. W., Forbes, L. J., Rosenthal, A. N., Raju, K. S., & Ramirez, A. J. (2013). Measuring the nature and duration of symptoms of cervical cancer in young women: developing an interview-based approach. BMC women's health, 13,

Shrestha, A. D., Neupane, D., Vedsted, P., & Kallestrup, P. (2018). Cervical Cancer Prevalence, Incidence and Mortality in Low and Middle Income Countries: A Systematic Review. Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 19(2), 319–324.

Chopra, S., Shukla, R., Budukh, A., & Shrivastava, S. K. (2019). External Radiation and Brachytherapy Resource Deficit for Cervical Cancer in India: Cll to Action for Treatment of All. Journal of global oncology, 5, 1–5.

Brasil. Lei n o 12.732 de 22 de novembro de 2012. Dispõe sobre o primeiro tratamento de paciente com neoplasia maligna comprovada e estabelece prazo para seu início. Diário Oficial União 2012; 23 nov.

Comprehensive Cervical Cancer Control: A Guide to Essential Practice. 2nd edition. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014. Annex 10, Cervical cancer treatment by FIGO stage. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK269617/.

Quinn BA, Deng X, Colton A, Bandyopadhyay D, Carter JS, Fields EC. Increasing age predicts poor cervical cancer prognosis with subsequent effect on treatment and overall survival. Brachytherapy. 2019 Jan - Feb;18(1):29-37.

Quinn BA, Deng X, Colton A, Bandyopadhyay D, Carter JS, Fields EC. Increasing

age predicts poor cervical cancer prognosis with subsequent effect on treatment and overall survival. Brachytherapy. 2019 Jan - Feb;18(1):29-37.

Cinar, D., & Tas, D. (2015). Cancer in the elderly. Northern clinics of Istanbul, 2(1), 73–80.

Song S, Rudra S, Hasselle MD, Dorn PL, Mell LK, Mundt AJ, Yamada SD, Lee NK,Hasan Y. The effect of treatment time in locally advanced cervical cancer in the era of concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Cancer. 2013 Jan 15;119(2):325-31.

Nascimento MI, Azevedo e Silva G. Espera pela radioterapia e sobrevida no câncer do colo do útero. Cad. Saúde Pública, Rio de Janeiro, 31(11):2437-2448, nov, 2015

Published

2020-07-20

How to Cite

SELVA, A. C. V.; GUARANA, C. V. P. dos S.; DIAS, V. de S.; SALES, J. T.; DE AZEVEDO, C. R. A. S. Estudo de coorte prospectiva de pacientes com câncer de colo de útero: a idade é um fator determinante? / Prospective cohort study of cervical cancer patients: is age a determining factor?. Brazilian Journal of Health Review, [S. l.], v. 3, n. 4, p. 8679–8695, 2020. DOI: 10.34119/bjhrv3n4-115. Disponível em: https://ojs.brazilianjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/BJHR/article/view/13491. Acesso em: 28 mar. 2024.

Issue

Section

Original Papers