Comparação entre métodos, metodologias e frameworks para construção de sistemas computacionais analíticos-cognitivos / Comparison between methods, methodologies and frameworks for the construction of analytical-cognitive computational systems

Authors

  • Vinicius Tadeu Freire Brazilian Journals Publicações de Periódicos, São José dos Pinhais, Paraná
  • Nizam Omar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv6n5-586

Keywords:

Ciência de Dados, Sistemas Cognitivos, Sistemas Analíticos, Descobrimento de conhecimento.

Abstract

Nos últimos anos houve um grande aumento de projetos analíticos- cognitivos mostrando a consolidação da ciência de dados. Esforços estão sendo feitos para identificar qual é a melhor forma de implementar este tipo de projeto, assim  surge a necessidade de comparar os métodos,metodologias e frameworks existentes como CRISP-DM, KDD, SEMMA, PMBOK, SWEBOK, TOGAF para identificar as similaridades, diferenças e viabilidade destes métodos, metodologias e frameworks na construção de sistemas computacionais analíticos-cognitivos.

 

 

References

CEARLEY, D. Top 10 Strategic Technology Trends for 2019.

GARTNER. Build the AI Business Case. 2018.

GARTNER. R & D leadership priorities in 2019. p. 8102, 2019.

KUGEL, P. Computing machines can’t be intelligent (...and Turing said so).Minds and Machines, v. 12, n. 4, p. 563–579, 2002. ISSN 09246495.

MORRIS, T. Current and Future Technologies in Automotive Development, Webinar,A, p. 182520, 2008.

YAMPOLSKIY, R. V.; SPELLCHECKER, M. S. Artificial Intelligence Safety and Cybersecurity: a Timeline of AI Failures. 2016.

PMBOK, A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide),4th Edition. 2008: Project Management Institute.

TOGAF VERSION 9.1,HAREN,VAN , 2011 10TH EDITION

SWEBOK, Guide to the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge (SWEBOK(R)): Version 3.0, 2014- 3RD EDITION ,2014- IEEE COMPUTER SOCIETY PRESS.

FAYYAD,U.M ET AL 1996 From data mining to knowledge discovery: an overview. In Fayyad, U. M.et al (Eds.), Advances in knowledge discovery and data mining. AAAI Press / The MIT Press.

SAS–SEMMA. SAS Institute. Accessed from http://www.sas.com/technologies/analytics/datamining/miner/semma.html, on May 2008.

CHAPMAN, P ET AL,, 2000. CRISP-DM 1.0 - Step-by-step data mining guide. Accessed from http://www.crisp-dm.org/CRISPWP-0800.pdf on May 2008

KDnugetts, 2014 - What main methodology are you using for your analytics, data mining, or data science projects? https://www.kdnuggets.com/polls/2014/analytics-data-mining-data-science-methodology.html

AZEVEDO,ANA & SANTOS, MANUEL(2008). KDD, semma and CRISP-DM: A parallel overview. 182-185.

Published

2020-05-28

How to Cite

Freire, V. T., & Omar, N. (2020). Comparação entre métodos, metodologias e frameworks para construção de sistemas computacionais analíticos-cognitivos / Comparison between methods, methodologies and frameworks for the construction of analytical-cognitive computational systems. Brazilian Journal of Development, 6(5), 31887–31904. https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv6n5-586

Issue

Section

Original Papers